🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed order, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that is projected to include as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's block that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its ruling.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the new maps. It had ordered the state to employ the districts established after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

With a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's ruling. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, noting that its opinion was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a breach of the law of the land.

National Redistricting Battle

This decision is part of a national battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that could add a number of additional conservative seats. The opposition, in response, have countered with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas AG welcomed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures representation favorable to Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic representatives lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

A leading Democratic figure argued the court had once again damaged its credibility by upholding a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.