🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Conflict Regarding System & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Order: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.